Isomorphism and Corporate Social Responsibility of Companies in the Sustainability Index of BM&FBovespa

Daniel Cargnin da Silva, Graciella Martignago, Wlamir Gonçalves Xavier, Simone Sehnem

Abstract


Objective: Our objective was to verify the existence of isomorphism within actions aimed at Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) of companies in the Sustainability Index (ISE) of BM & FBovespa.

Method: In this qualitative research study, we completed a content analysis of sustainability reports and information from the official websites of ISE companies.

Originality / Relevance: Past studies related corporate social responsibility and isomorphism and analyzed them as the motivation and influence for the presentation of sustainability reports.  However, these studies have failed to identify whether there is isomorphism in Corporate Social Responsibility actions.

Results: When reviewing all private Brazilian companies, the financial institutions sector was the one that presented the most isomorphic processes.  We also verified that multinational companies suffer limited isomorphic pressures; additionally, no isomorphism was verified in companies that have the state as the majority partner.

Theoretical / methodological contributions: This research contributes to the study of the process of isomorphism in relation to Corporate Social Responsibility, by analyzing data divulged by the companies (verifying similarities of the adopted actions).


Keywords


Isomorphism. Sustainability Reports. Corporate Social Responsibility.

References


Aksak, E. O. & Duman, S. A. (2016). Gaining legitimacy through CSR: an analysis of Turkey’s 30 largest corporations. Business Ethics: a european review, 25, 238-257.

Baddache, F. & Nicolai, I. (2013). Follow the Leader: How corporate social responsibility influences strategy and practice in the business community. Journal of Business Strategy, 34, 26-35.

Bardin, L. (2016). Análise de conteúdo. São Paulo: Edições 70.

Bhimani, A.; Silvola, H.; Sivabalan, P. (2016). Voluntary CSR Reporting: a study of early and late reporter motivations and outcomes. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 28, 77-101.

BM&F Bovespa. (2015). Metodologia do Índice de Sustentabilidade Empresarial (ISE). Disponível na internet via WWW.URL: http://www.bmfbovespa.com.br/pt_br/produtos/indices/indices-de-sustentabilidade/indice-de-sustentabilidade-empresarial-ise.htm. Arquivo capturado em 04 de setembro de 2017.

Lei n. 9.991, de 24 julho de 2000. Dispõe sobre realização de investimentos em pesquisa e desenvolvimento e em eficiência energética por parte das empresas concessionárias, permissionárias e autorizadas do setor de energia elétrica, e dá outras providências.

Diário Oficial da União. Brasília, DF. Disponível na internet via WWW.URL: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/Leis/L9991.htm Arquivo capturado em Acesso 05 de setembro de 2017.

Campbell, J. L. (2007). CSR, why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? an institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32, 946-967.

Carroll, A. B. (1999). Corporate social responsibility: evolution of a definitional construct. Business & Society, 38, 268-295.

Cooper, D. R., & Schindler, P. S. (2011). Métodos de pesquisa em administração (10a ed.). Porto Alegre: Bookman.

Dimaggio, P. J. & Powell, W. W. (2005). A gaiola de ferro revisitada: isomorfismo institucional e racionalidade coletiva nos campos organizacionais. Revista de Administração de Empresas,45, 74-89.

Ferrero, J. M. & Sanchez, I. M. G. (2017). Coercive, normative and mimetic isomorphism as determinants of the voluntary assurance of sustainability reports. International Business Review,26, 102-118.

Gao, Y. (2011). Philanthropic disaster relief giving as a response to institutional pressure: Evidence from China. Journal of Business Research, 64, 1377-1382.

Hah, K. & Freeman, S. (2014). Multinational enterprise subsidiaries and their CSR: a conceptual framework of the management of CSR in Smaller Emerging Economies.Journal of Business Ethics,122, 125-136.

Jacomosi, F. A.; Casagrande, R. M., Reis, L. G. (2015). O isomorfismo nos relatórios de sustentabilidade: uma análise das empresas brasileiras que compõem o Dow Jones Sustainability Index. Revista de Gestão Ambiental e Sustentabilidade, 4, 49-64.

Kostova, T., Roth, K., & Dacin, M. T. (2008). Institutional theory in the study

of multinational corporations: a critique and new directions. Academy of Management Review, 33, 994-1006.

Machado, D. P. & Ott, E. (2015). Estratégias de legitimação social empregadas na evidenciação ambiental: um estudo à luz da teoria da legitimidade. Revista Universo Contábil, 11, 136-156.

Mapurung, P. V. R., Lima, B. C. C., & Holanda, A. P. (2015). Disclosure Social e Isomorfismo nas Empresas Listadas no Índice de Sustentabilidade Empresarial. Revista de Administração da UFSM, 8, 267-281.

Melo, F., Neto de; Froes, C . (2001). Gestão da responsabilidade social corporativa: o caso brasileiro. Rio de Janeiro: Qualitymark Ed.

North, D. C. (1991). Institutions. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5, 97-112.

Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 16, 145–179.

Othman, S.; Darus, F.; Arshad, R. (2011). The influence of coercive isomorphism on corporate social responsibility reporting and reputation. Social Responsibility Journal, 7, 119-135.

Pedersen, E. R.G.; Gwozdz, W. (2014). From Resistance to Opportunity-Seeking: Strategic Responses to Institutional Pressures for Corporate Social Responsibility in the Nordic Fashion Industry. Journal of Business Ethics. 119, 245-264.

Rese, N. & Canhada, D. I. D. (2012). Análise dos relatórios de sustentabilidade de bancos comerciais. Revista de Administração FACES Journal, 2, 130-149.

Schwartz, M. S. & Carroll, A. B. (2003). Corporate social responsibility: a three-domain approach. Business Ethics Quarterly.13, 503-530.

Scott, W. R. (1995).Institutions and organizations. London: SAGE Publications.

Wei, Y. C.; Egri, C. P.; Lin, C. Y. Y. (2014). Do corporate social responsibility practices yield different business benefits in eastern and western contexts? Chinese Management Studies, 8, 556-576.

Windolph, S. E.; Schaltegger, S.; Herzig, C. (2014). Implementing corporate sustainability. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 5, 378-404.

Yin, J. & Zhang, Y. (2012). Institutional dynamics and corporate social responsibility (csr) in an emerging country context: evidence from China. Journal of Business Ethics, 111, 301-316.


Full Text: PDF (Português (Brasil))

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Iberoamerican Journal of Strategic Management  e-ISSN: 2176-0756