Influência Institucional em Arranjos Produtivos Locais para Criação de Inovação

Oscar Sarquis González Braga, Sérgio Henrique Arruda Cavalcante Forte

Abstract


While government and regulatory policies can promote significant changes in product technologies and processes, which in turn benefit industrial innovative, if not carefully managed can generate significant deleterious effects on the innovation process (Patanakul & Pinto, 2014). Based on this assumption, this research objectived to highlight the key role of institutions in the process of creation and innovation diffusion in particularly within sectors with low technological dynamism. To this end, we used the data tabulated by Pintec (2013) on the clothing and food industries in the state of Ceará. Brazil. Starting from a model in which we focused on the marketing and technological usage profile dimensions in those sectors, it was observed that the model did not explain fully the creation and technology diffusion process. Then added a new dimension to the model considering the institutional role in supporting the innovation process, so getting the new methodological framework for better explanatory power of the phenomena involved.


Keywords


Clusters; Innovation; Institutions; Strategic Resources; Pintec

References


Amin, A.(1999). An institutionalist perspective on regional economic develop¬ment. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, London, 23(2) , 365-378.

Amin, A; Thrift, N.(1992). Neo-Marshallian nodes in global networks. Interna¬tional Journal of Urban and Regional Research, London, 16 (4), 571-587,

Ashford, N. A. (2000). An innovation-based strategy for a sustainable environment. In: J.Hemmelskamp, K. Rennings, & F. Leone (Eds.), Innovation-oriented environmental regulation Theoretical approach and empirical analysis (p. 67–107). New York/Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

Barney, J. (1991).Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, Charlotte NC, 17 (1), 99-120.

Bell, M.; Albu, M. (1999).Knowledge systems and technological dynamism in industrial clusters in developing countries. World Development, Montreal, 27 (9), Sept., 1715-1914.

Bossink, B.A. G. (2002). A Dutch public–private strategy for innovation in sustainable construction. Construction.Management and Economics, Amsterdam, 20 (7),633–642.

Brito, E. P. Z; Brito, L. A. L; Porto, E. C; Szilagyi, M. E.(2010). A Relação entre aglomeração produtiva e crescimento: a aplicação de um modelo multinível ao setor industrial paulista. Revista de Administração Con¬temporânea, Rio de Janeiro, v. 14, n. 4, p. 615-632.

Camagni, R.(1991). Local ‘milieu’, uncertainty and innovation networks: to¬wards a new dynamic theory of economic space. In: CAMAGNI, R. (Ed). Innovation networks: spatial perspectives. London: Belhaven Press, 121-142.

Carlsson, B. (1995).Technological systems and economic performance: the case of factory automation.Dordrecht: Kluwer.

Cassiolato, J. & Lastres, H. (2003). Novas políticas na era do conhecimento: o foco em arranjos produtivos e inovativos locais. Revista Parcerias Estratégicas, Brasília,v.1, n. 17,set., p. 5-29.

Cnae 2.0. (2014). Tabela P2011_H1_Ceara. Disponível em .Acessadoem 03/06/2014.

Cooper, D. R., & Schindler, P. S. (2008). Métodos de pesquisa em Administração (7a ed.). São Paulo: Bookman.

D’Aveni, R.A. (1994). Hypercompetition: Managing the dynamics of strategicmaneuvering.New York: The Free Press.

Dimaggio, Paul J.; Powell, Walter W. (2007). A jaula de ferro revisitada: isomorfismo institucional e racionalidade coletiva nos campos organizacionais. In: CALDAS, Miguel P.; Bertero, Carlos Osmar (Coords.).Teoria das Organizações. São Paulo: Atlas.

Edquist. C; Björn, J. (1997).Institutions and organizations in system of innovation. In: Charles Edquist, Org. Systems of Innovation: Technologies, Institutions and Organizations. London: Routledge.

Freeman, C. (1995).The national systems of innovation. In:Historical perspective. Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge, 19 (1), Feb, 5-24,

Hansen, P. B; Oliveira, L. R.(2009).Proposta de modelo para avaliação sistêmica do desempenho competitivo de arranjos produtivos:o caso do arranjo coureiro-calçadista do Vale dos Sinos (RS — Brasil). Produto &Produção, Porto Alegre, v. 10, n. 3, p. 61-75.

Keller, Matthew R.; Block, Fred. (2013). Explaining the transformation in the US innovation system: the impact of a small government program. Socio-Economic Review, Oxford University Press and the Society for the Advancement of Socio-Economics, doi: 10.1093/ser/mws021, 11 (4), 629-656.

Jung, C. F. (2004). Metodologia para pesquisa & desenvolvimento: aplicada a novas tecnologias, produtos e processos. Rio de Janeiro: Axcel Books.

Link, A. N., &Scott, J. T. (2010). Government as entrepreneur: Evaluating the commercialization success of SBIR projects. Research Policy, London, v. 39, n. 5,p. 589–601.

Malerba, F. (1999).Sectoral systems of innovation and production. Research Policy,London, 31 (2),p. 247–264.

Mazzucato, Mariana.(2013). The Entrepreneurial State: Debunking Public vs. Private Myths in Risk and Innovation (Anthem Other Canon Economics) [EBook Kindle], May.

Mascena, K.M.C. De,; Figueiredo, F.C.; Boaventura, J.M.G. (2013).Clusters e APL’s: Análise bibliométrica das publicações nacionais no período 2000 a 2011. Revista de Administração de Empresas - RAE, São Paulo, v. 53, n. 5, p. 454-468.

Nelson, R. R. Rosenberg, N. (1993).National innovation systems: A comparative analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.

Newlands, D.(2003).Competition and cooperation in industrial clusters: the implications for public policy. European Planning Studies, London, 11 (5), 521-532.

Patanakul, Peerasit; Pinto, Jeffrey K. (2014). Examining the roles of government policy on innovation. Journal of High Technology Management Research, London,25 (2), 97–10.

Peng, M.W. et al. (2009). The institution-based viewas a third legfor a strategy tripod. Journal Academy of Management Perspectives,Dallas,23(3), 63-81.

Pintec. Pesquisa de Inovação. (2013). Instruções para o preenchimento do questionário. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE, 2013. Disponível em . Acessado em 12.05.2013

Porter, M. E. (1998). Clusters and the new economics of competition. Harvard Business Review, in press.

Rais/Caged. (2013). Ministério do Trabalho e Emprego.Disponível em . Acessado em 16/03/2014.

Silvestre, B. S; Dalcol, P. R. T.(2007).Conexões de conhecimento e postu¬ras tecnológicas das firmas: evidências da aglomeração industrial de petróleo e gás da Bacia de Campos. Gestão &Produção, São Paulo, v. 14, n. 2, p. 221-238.

Souza, Enilvan M, et al. (2013). Inovação Como Mecanismo de Fuga do Isomorfismo Organizacional. Revista Gestão & Tecnologia, Pedro Leopoldo, v. 13, n. 2, p. 72-93, mai./ago.

Vaydia, S. (2011).Understanding strategic alliances: an integrated framework.Journal of Management Policy and Practice, New York,12 (6),90-100.

Viana, Fernando L, E. (2009). Análise setorial Indústria do Vetuário, ETENE - Banco do Nordeste, dez.


Full Text: PDF (Português (Brasil))

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Iberoamerican Journal of Strategic Management  e-ISSN: 2176-0756

Licença Creative Commons
Este obra está licenciado com uma Licença
Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial-CompartilhaIgual 4.0 Internacional