How to Review an Article: The Reviewer's Role and a Roadmap for New Reviewer

Manuel Aníbal Silva Portugal Vasconcelos Ferreira

Abstract


Review as an Article: The Role of the Statutory and a Roadmap for New Reviewers


DOI: 10.5585 / riae.v13i2.2110

References


Bailey, C., Hair, J., Hermanson, D. & Crittenden, V. (2012). Marketing academics’ perceptions of the peer review process, Marketing Education Review, 22(3): 265-280.

Bailey, C., Hermanson, D. & Louwers, T. (2008). An examination of the peer review process in accounting journals, Journal of Accounting Education, 26: 55-72.

Bailey, C., Hermanson, D. & Tomkins, J. (2008). The peer review process in finance journals, Journal of Financial Education, 34(2): 1-27.

Bedeian, A. (2003). The manuscript review process: The proper roles of authors, referees, and editors, Journal of Management Inquiry, 12(4): 331-338.

Bornman, L. (2010). Does the journal peer review select the “best” from the work submitted? The state of empirical research. IETE Technical Review, 27(2): 93-96.

Bornmann, L. & Daniel, H-D. (2007). Gatekeepers of science: Effects of external reviewers’ attributes on the assessments of fellowship applications. Journal of Informetrics, 1(1): 83–91.

Byrne, D. (2000). Common reasons for rejecting manuscripts at medical journals: A survey of editors and peer reviewers. Science Editor, 23(2): 39-44.

Crane, D. (1967). The gatekeepers of science: Some factors affecting the selection of articles for scientific journals. American Sociologist, 33: 195-201.

Demski, J. & Zimmerman, J. (2000). On “research vs. teaching:” A long term perspective, Accounting Horizons, 14(3): 343-352.

DiPiro, J. (2013). Acceptance and rejection of manuscripts for publication in the American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 77(4): 1-2.

Ellison, G. (2011). Is peer review in decline? Economic Inquiry, 49(3): 635-657.

Epstein, S. (1995). What can be done to improve the review process, American Psychologist, 50(10): 883-885.

Ferreira, M. (2013a). A pesquisa e a estruturação do artigo acadêmico em administração. Revista Ibero-Americana de Estratégia, 12(2): p. 1-11.

Ferreira, M. (2013b). O processo editorial: Da submissão à rejeição (ou aceite). Revista Ibero-Americana de Estratégia, 12(3): 1-11.

Ferreira, M. (2014). Responder aos revisores. Revista Ibero-Americana de Estratégia, 13(1): 1-6.

Fiske, D. & Fogg, L. (1990). But the reviewers are making different criticisms of my paper. American Psychologist, 45:591-598.

Gans, J. & Shepherd, G. (1994). How are the mighty fallen – rejected classic articles by leading economists. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8: 165-79.

Gilmore, A., Carson, D. & Perry, C. (2006). Academic publishing: Best practice for editors, guest editors, and reviewers, European Business Review, 18(6): 468-478.

Harrison, D. (2002). Obligations and obfuscations in the review process, Academy of Management Journal, 48(6): 1079-1084.

Holbrook, M. (1986). A note on sadomasochism in the review process: I hate when that happens, Journal of Marketing, 50(3): 104-108.

Lovejoy, T., Revenson, T. & France, C. (2011). Reviewing manuscripts for peer-review journals: A primer for novice and seasoned reviewers. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 42: 1-13.

Miller, B., Pevehouse, J., Rogowski, R., Tingley, D. & Wilson, R. (2011). How to be a peer reviewer: A guide for recent and soon-to-be PhDs. PS: Political Science & Politics, 46(1): 120-123.

Oler, D. & Pasewark, W. (2014). How to review a paper. (January 28, 2014). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2194232.

Pavan, C. & Stumpf, I. (2009). Avaliação pelos pares nas revistas brasileiras de ciência da informação: Procedimentos e percepções dos atores. Encontros Bibli, 14(28): 73-92,

Peters, D. & Ceci, S. (1982). Peer-review practices of psychological journals: the fate of published articles, submitted again, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 5: 187-195.

Radford, D. & Smillie, L., Wilson, R. & Grace, A. (1999). The criteria used by editors of scientific dental journals in the assessment of manuscripts submitted for publication. British Dental Journal, 187(7): 376-379.

Ramos-Rodriguez, A. & Ruiz-Navarro, J. (2004). Changes in the intellectual structure of strategic management research: a bibliometric study of strategic management journal, 1980-2000. Strategic Management Journal, 25: 981-1004.

Spiegel, M. (2012). Reviewing less – progressing more, The Review of Financial Studies, 25(5): 1331-1338.


Full Text: PDF (Português (Brasil))

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Iberoamerican Journal of Strategic Management  e-ISSN: 2176-0756

Licença Creative Commons
Este obra está licenciado com uma Licença
Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial-CompartilhaIgual 4.0 Internacional