Editorial Comment Responding to Reviewers

Manuel Aníbal Silva Portugal Vasconcelos Ferreira

Abstract


Responding to Reviewers

 

DOI:10.5585/riae.v13i1.2099


References


Agarwal, R., Echambadi, R., Franco, A. & Sarkar, M. (2006). Reap rewards: Maximizing benefits from reviewer comments. Academy of Management Journal, 49(2): 191-196.

Annesley, T. (2011). Top 10 tips for responding to reviewer and editor comments. Clinical Chemistry, 57(4): 551-554.

Becker, H. (1986). Writing for social scientists. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Bedeian, A. (2003). The manuscript review process: The proper roles of authors, referees, and editors. Journal of Management Inquiry, 12(4): 331-338.

Bedeian, A. (2004). Peer review and the social construction of knowledge in the management discipline. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 3(2): 198-216.

Beyer, J., Chanove, R. & Fox, W. (1995). The review process and the fates of manuscripts submitted to the AMJ. Academy of Management Journal, 38(5):1219-1260.

Casadevall, A. & Fang, F. (2009). Is peer review censorship?. Infection and Immunity, 77(4): 1273-1274.

Ferreira, M. (2013). Comentário Editorial: O processo editorial: Da submissão à rejeição (ou aceite), Revista Ibero Americana de Estratégia, 12(3): 1-11.

Frey, B. (2003). Publisihing as prostitution: Choosing between one’s own ideas and academic success. Public Choice, 116: 205-223.

Hamermesh, D. (1994). Facts and myths about refereeing. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8(1): 153-163.

Miller, C. (2006). Peer review in the organizational and management sciences: Prevalence and effects of reviewer hostility, bias and dissensus. Academy of Management Journal, 49(3): 425-430.

Miner, J. (2003). Commentary on Arthur Bedeian’s “The manuscript review process: The proper roles of authors, referees, and editors”. Journal of Management Inquiry, 12(4): 339-343.

Rowland, F. (2002). The peer review process. Learned Publishing, 15(4): 247-258.

Rynes, S. (2006). Observations on ‘Anatomy of an R&R and other reflections’. Academy of Management Journal, 49(2): 208-214.

Seibert, S. (2006). Anatomy of an R&R (Or, reviewers are an author's best friends…). Academy of Management Journal, 49(2): 203-207.

Seibert, S. (2006). Anatomy of an R&R (or, reviewers are an author’s best friends...)’. Academy of Management Journal, 49(2): 203-207.

Starbuck, W. (2003). Turning lemons into lemonade: where is the value in peer reviews?. Journal of Management Inquiry, 12(4): 344-351.

Tsang, E. & Frey, B. (2007). The As-Is journal review process: Let authors own their ideas’, Academy of Management Learning & Education, 6(1): 128-136.

Williams, H. (2004). How to reply to referees' comments when submitting manuscripts for publication. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 51(1): 79-83.


Full Text: PDF (Português (Brasil))

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Iberoamerican Journal of Strategic Management  e-ISSN: 2176-0756

Licença Creative Commons
Este obra está licenciado com uma Licença
Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial-CompartilhaIgual 4.0 Internacional