Analysis of Foundations of Resource-Based Theory

António José Pinto Pedrosa, Fernando Manuel Pereira Oliveira Carvalho

Abstract


The assumptions of the resource-based theory (RBV) are often tested using an approach centered on the heterogeneity of resources, allowing only identify specific resources or capabilities that should be exploited to achieve competitive advantage. In this paper we use a conceptual approach seeking to test whether value, rare and inimitable combinations of resources and capabilities, rather than their specificity, achieve competitive advantage and performance. The results obtained from 368 questionnaires validated by business managers of several Portuguese economic sectors show that the increase in value, rarity and inimitability of the combinations tested, raises the company's competitive advantage, and that performance is achieved by this route. The findings are of interest for the development of the field of strategic management and for managers enabling strategic decision-making based on valuable, rare and inimitable company`s resources and capabilities combinations.

Keywords


Value; Rarity; Inimitability; Competitive Advantage; Performance.

References


Amit, R. & Schoemaker, P. (1993). Strategic assets and organizational rent. Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 14, 33-46.

Barney, J.B. (1991). Firm resources as sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, Vol 17, No 1, 99-120.

______, J., Ketchen Jr., & D. Wright, M., (2011). The future of resource-based theory: rivatalization or decline?, Journal of Management, Vol. 37 No. 5, September, 1299-1315.

Baron, R.M., & Kenny, D.A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51, 1173:1182.

Cattell RB. (1978). The scientific use of factor analysis. Plenum: New York.

Delaney J.T., & Huselid, M.A. (1996). The impact of human resource management practices on perceptions of organizational performance. The Academy of Management Journal, Vol.39, No. 4., 949-969.

Dierickx, Ingemar, & Cool, Karel (1989). Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage. Management Science, Vol 35, No 12, 1504-1511.

Eisenhardt, K., & Martin, J. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: what are they?. Strategic Management Journal, Vol 21, 1105-1121.

Henderson, R. & Cockburn, I. (1994). Measuring competence? Exploring firm effects in pharmaceutical research. Strategic Management Journal, 15 (Winter Special Issue),63-84.

Irwin, J.G., Hoffman, J.J., & Bruce. T. (1998). The effect of the acquisition of technological innovations. Journal of Engineering & Technology Management, Vol. 15 (1): 25-55.

Khandwalla PN. (1976). Some top management styles, their context, and performance. Organization and Administrative Sciences, 7(4): 21–51.

King, A. & Zeithaml, C. (2001). Competences and firm performance: examining the causal ambiguity paradox. Strategic Management Journal, n.º 22, 75-99.

Leiblein, M. (2011, July). What do resource-and capability-based theories propose?, Journal of Management, Vol. 37 Nº 4, 909-932.

Lippman, Steven A. & Rumelt, Richard P. 1982. Uncertain imitability: an analysis of inter firm deficiency under competition. The Bell Journal of Economics, 13: 418-438.

Mahoney, Joseph & Pandian, Rajendran (1992). The resource-based view within the conversation of strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, Vol 13, 363-380.

Makadok, (2001). Toward a synthesis of the resource-based and dynamic-capability views of rent creation. Strategic Management Journal; Vol.22. 387-401.

Newbert, S.L. (2007). Empirical research on the resource-based view of the firm: an assessment and suggestions for future research. Strategic Management Journal; Vol. 28. 121-146.

_______, S.L. (2008). Value, rareness, competitive advantage, and performance: a conceptual-level empirical investigation of the resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, Jan, 29, 745-768.

Nunnally, JC. (1978). Psychometric theory. (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.

Pallant, J. (2007). SPSS survival manual: a step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS for windows (Version 15). (3rd edition). Allen&Unwin.

Penrose, E. (1995). The theory of the growth of the firm. (3 rd Edition). Oxford University Press.

Pessoa, Fernando (1926). Palavras iniciais. Revista de Comércio e Contabilidade, nº 1, p.5

Peteraf, M.A. (1993). The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource-based view. Strategic Management Journal,Vol.14, 179-191.

Porter, Michael E. (1980). Competitive Strategy. New York: The Free Press.

Powell, T.C. (2001). Competitive advantage: logical and philosophical considerations. Strategic Management Journal, Vol.22, 875-888.

Reed, R., DeFillippi, R.j., (1990). Causal ambiguity, barriers to imitation, and sustainable competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 15, 88-102.

Rumelt, Richard P. (1984). Towards a Strategic Theory of the Firm. in Richard B. Lamb, ed. Competitive Strategic Management. New Jersey: Englewood Cliffs.

______, Richard. P. (1987).Theory, strategy, and entrepreneurship. in D. J. Teece (ed.). The Competitive challenge: Strategies for industrial innovation and renewal. 137-158. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.

Shapiro, C.(1989). The theory of business strategy. RNAD Journal of Economics, Vol.20, 125-137

Simon, (1978). Rational decision-making in business organizations. Economic Sciences, Nobel Memorial Lecture, 8, 351-357.

Teece, D., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and Strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, Vol 18:7, 509-533

Wang, C. & Ahmed, P. (2007). Dynamic capabilities: a review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, Volume 9, Issue 1, 31-55.

Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A Resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, Vol 5, 171-180


Full Text: PDF (Português (Brasil))

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Iberoamerican Journal of Strategic Management  e-ISSN: 2176-0756